Copyright © 2007 by William R. Mistele. All rights reserved.
The Cosmic Letter U
Introduction
Among
the 27 cosmic letters, the letters E, U, UE, and OE specifically refer to the
akashic principle. Letters such as CH
and H, by virtue of their violet color, have some analogy to akasha. Akasha, as the source of the four elements,
is also the source from which the entire physical universe manifests. For some, these akasha based letters may
present a higher level of difficulty.
Let’s take a look.
Franz Bardon attributes the color black as
in shiny or ivory black as the color for this letter of U. The sensation is akasha as in penetrating
through space and time. What is the
color black doing among these cosmic letters?
Bardon refers to akasha as actually being
colorless. It is outside of the visible
spectrum of light. He uses dark
ultraviolet as in the cosmic letter E or black with U as a way to approach the
vibration of akasha.
The color black has many cultural and spiritual
associations, some good and some not so good. While on Iona, Scotland, I entered a
Christian hermit’s cave by the ocean.
The energy in the cave was remarkable.
The early Christian saint who lived there had a sense of a great war
between light and darkness. Christ has
sometimes been referred to as the light of the world. Darkness must then be bad, huh?
The Hawaiians have a saying, “When the sun
appears, everything falls into place.”
But we also have the song, What a
Wonderful World:
I see skies of blue, clouds
of grey, the bright blessed day, the
dark, sacred night, and I think to myself, what a wonderful world.
And
of course,
Silent
night, Holy night
Of
course, we could say God is the creator equally of light and darkness. I mentioned to someone one time that given
the rate at which black holes form from exploding stars, our galaxy probably
has around ten million black holes in it.
I then asked, “What does that tell you about God?” The person replied,
“God likes darkness.”
And ninety-five per cent of the matter in
the universe is dark matter. It does not
emit any radiation detectable by science.
In other words, no light shines from most of the universe—it neither
radiates nor reflects light.
Human beings are said to be a microcosm of
the greater macrocosm. We are described
as being in the image of God. In Quabbalah, we reflect in ourselves the wonder and powers of
creation. If we assume this, then any
genuine system of initiation or spiritual transformation will have to come to
grips with the side of life and spirit that is dark—the part of life that is
unseen, not easily known, and completely outside of the normal range of our
perceptions.
We have been working with the sense of
sight and the perception of color. We
could also relate the color black to a kinesthetic sense of touch. Instead of black, we could say empty as in
nothing to touch. Space is empty and
obviously has no color. Is empty space
bad? Nothing can appear, no light, no
form, no objects without space to contain it.
Various religions have attempted to work
with akasha along similar lines. In
Buddhism, Prajnaparamita is described as being the
Mother of the Buddhas. Prajnaparamita is
emptiness.
In Taoism, Wugi
is like the Tao: it is formless, undifferentiated without opposites existing
within it. Everything derives from Wugi.
In fact, there is a movement and form
involving Wugi in Tai Chi Chuan. One master refers to “raise hands,” the first
movement in the longer form as starting from a state of Wugi
in which masculine and feminine or yang and yin are undifferentiated. As you begin to raise your hands, you move
from Wugi into the feminine. As you raise your hands to where they are
fully extended, you move to maximum yang.
Then as you lower your hands you return to yin or feminine.
Raise hands contains the entire longer form
within it. Some masters have students
practice raise hands for six months before learning any other moves. That was the old way. Taoists like Wugi. They might even say at times, “No one can push
me over because there is nothing here to push against.”
Imagine the incredible difficulty prophets
of the Old Testament had in trying to present a religion, unlike the
surrounding pagan religions, that emphasized akasha exclusively as being the
primary attribute of God. How do you
teach that God has no form or image? He
is not a bull, cow, or calf. He is not a
reptile, dog, or cat. And he is not in
human form hurling lightning bolts at his enemies to retain his power and
authority.
But like akasha, he wishes to assert his
presence and perspective when it comes to establishing harmony on the three
lower planes—in clarity of thought and plans on the mental plane; in
inspiration and purity of motive on the astral plane, and through justice and
prosperity in the physical world. We
might easily conclude that the prophets of such a religion had an impossible
task and were doomed to failure from the beginning.
In Psalm
90, however, the writer makes exactly that commitment. He says, “Oh Lord, You have been our dwelling
place through all generations. Before
the mountains were brought forth or ever You did form
the heavens and the earth, even from everlasting to everlasting You are
God.” The writer of this psalm says our
dwelling place is with a being who predates the
creation of the universe. To make a
statement like that you have to be in love with akasha.
Of the 27cosmic letters, the letter M is
called the mother letter. All that is
feminine and yin arises from it. CH with
its ties to the moon is another of the most feminine letters. But if there is a third, it would be this
letter U. Though within it there are no
opposites, it is still fantastically feminine. And, as I mention on the astral and physical
levels, it is quite romantic in practice—when separation is overcome, two
become one.
In a group discussion one time I described
a woman as being empty, meaning she has a marvelous receptivity. Another woman who was present took immediate
offense at that description. But I meant
it as a compliment. The womb has the
quality of being empty as in Lao Tzu’s saying,
One who has the wings of a
man and also the wings of a woman is in himself/herself a womb of the world and
being a womb of the world continuously, endlessly gives birth.
Akashic
Plane
Three
Sense Concentrations
The
cosmic letters are energies created by three sense concentrations. For color, shiny black or ivory black. As I practice this, I get a sense of the
color as being completely receptive, almost tactile. It takes you back to the origin of something
before any form appears. As black, it
can receive impressions of anything or of any nature.
For
the sensation, this is not the sense
of penetrating through space and time typical of what Bardon attributes to the
dark, ultraviolet color. This sensation
is like the Taoist Wugi—it is undifferentiated
without the presence of any form, mass, or energy of any kind. This is not penetrating because there is
nothing to penetrate. It is a state of
being without separation or differentiation.
The
sound is the note of “B.” In this
case, it is like the “sound of silence.”
It synchronizes with the color and sensation as if it is vanishing into
or merging with them. As with this sound
on the three lower planes, it dissolves anything that distinguishes or
differentiates one thing from another.
Basically
then the letter U on the akashic plane is underneath all opposites. It is the source from which they arise. The four elements are spun out of it. There is no Aries or Libra, no Leo or
Aquarius. It is the source of the entire
Zodiac. There is no earth, air, water,
or fire. It sings each of these into
being through its voice.
The Buddhist Heart Sutra discusses the issue directly by taking the point of
view of akasha in regard to human experience:
Sariputra, form does not differ from
emptiness: Emptiness does not differ from form. Form then is emptiness.
Emptiness then is form. Sensation, perception, volition, and consciousness, are
also like this.
Sariputra, all Dharmas are
marked with emptiness.... there is no form, no sensation, perception, volition
or consciousness. No eye, ear, nose, tongue, body or mind; nor form, sound,
smell, taste, touch, or Dharmas.... No wisdom, and no
attainment, with nothing to attain.
Because the Bodhisattva is the Perfect Wisdom of emptiness, his mind has no
hindrance. Having no hindrance, there is no fear….
In
feudal societies, most people have their role in life assigned to them. They have very few options or choices when it
comes to making plans for the future.
Consequently, it is beneficial to retreat into akasha. It makes sense to just let go of your
frustrations and passions and become nothing as you mediate in the temple. Done meditating, return to
your assigned place in life refreshed.
Your worries and anxieties have dissolved.
The Heart
Sutra above is a superb example of viewing life from akasha. Of course there is no fear—if you have no
identity, no ego, and nothing you need worry about then you have no hindrances
confronting you. It may sound very
strange our ears, but someone way back when really understand the cosmic letter
U at least in terms of the akashic plane.
I am from a different society. Freedom of choice, of expression, and determining
one’s own direction in life are absolutely essential and part of the foundation
of good government. I am from a
pluralistic, post-industrial, and democratic society. How on earth does akasha, as in the cosmic
letter U, find a way to enter my consciousness without undermining the need for
individual choice and action? If you have within you an awareness of being
nothing, how do you act and take responsibility for the world?
The
image that comes to my mind as I mediate on the U in akasha is sitting in a
theater after a play has been performed.
Perhaps you acted in this play. Perhaps you wrote it or directed it. Your friends were in audience and among the
actors. You even know critics who will
review it. You had dinner with one last
night. You know the two individuals who
financed the play. You know the janitor
who cleans up. And you know the
custodian who will lock up the theater tonight after everyone has left.
Now everyone has gone except you. The lights are out. The theater is empty. But you have decided to sit in front of a
large mirror which you have dragged to the center of the stage. A few beams of moonlight from a high overhead
window dimly reflect your image. The
moon soon sets. You watch as your
reflection disappears into darkness. No
more your handsome face. Not even the
mirror is seen.
Now there is nothing. No applauding audience. No bowing actors. No play.
No images, no form, and no action.
And you reflect--the mirror is not
gone. It has not lost its reflective
power. There are just no images
appearing within it.
And you reflect—this could be the original
Globe Theatre in London late in the night after the first performance of King Lear. It could be a theater in ancient Greece after
the performance of Antigone. It could equally be after a performance of Hamlet in a theater in a Mars’ colony a
hundred years in the future.
Briefly, you slip inside the mind of
Sophocles. You see the play through his
eyes and why he wrote it to reflect the issues of his age. “Bitter is the price
of wisdom,” Sophocles’ thinks and your face briefly takes on his expression.
You slip inside the mind of Shakespeare. His thoughts become your thoughts. You laugh to yourself the way he laughed when
he wrote one of his jokes into the script.
You ask yourself, why has art appeared
among human beings? What part does it
play from the cave paintings in 35,000 B.C. to all the variety and forms it
takes today? What is its origin in human
consciousness and why do we seek reflections of ourselves? Why all this passion for action? Why drama? Why desire and pleasure? Why pain and the quest for gratification?
Consciousness is like the mirror. In the darkness, the mirror is unseen. When the light is on, we use the mirror in so
many ways. Endless is the array of
images and motions. And you reflect—we
are the mirror. We are the origin and
within us rests original being.
In the movie 2001, in one moment apes acquired tools and advance. In another moment, we stepped onto another
celestial body. And in a third moment we
made the transition from material being to pure spiritual being. Time and history separate these moments of
transformation.
But in the mirror, in the
awareness that underlies all consciousness, there is no separation of these
moments—no ancient Greece, no modern world, no future colonies. All action arises from the same origin: the
power to shape and to create has always been within us. Like the mirror in the darkness, we know it
is there but only ask about its nature at the moment when everything is about
to disappear.
Yet this source is closer to us than our
breath. Our five senses are spun from
out of it. Every fiber of our being is a
part of it.
Art
reminds us of this truth—how easy it is to identify with characters who are not
us. How familiar the conflicts and
passions of those from other ages. And
whether past or present, how incredibly easy it is to become trapped in our
self-image, the images, roles, and routines assigned to us or that we have
invented, fabricated, and made up. How
strange that we identify ourselves with the brief images that appear in the
mirror and forget that the creative power of the mirror is also who we
are.
This creative power? It is to understand anything and to discover
the original purpose underlying anything.
From the point of view of U akasha, when
we wake up in the morning from dreaming we could be the mind, soul, and body of
anyone on earth. U akasha is this
awareness of everything—time, history, every individual thing and
identity—there is no separation.
I am sure you imagine how easy it would be
for someone who suddenly sees life from the point of view of U akasha to feel
overwhelmed. All the everyday things
they used to take for granted as being important are suddenly called into
question.
But as the Mahabrata might say, “Original
being is never without action. It
remains decisive and strong when all others’ wills fail them.” Let us move then to the mental plane to see
how this mystery plays out.
It is too bad that Christianity has no
practice involving akasha. It is counterproductive
to say the least to talk about compassion and love if you have no actual method
for feeling empathy with others—with establishing a connection to them on some
level. And if you stir into the pot the spice
of seeing others as sinners and evil, well, you write off the opportunity to
love right from the start. I suspect if
Christianity has such methods at its disposal they are sealed off and locked
away in first century manuscripts hidden down in the forgotten corridors of the
Vatican library.
Tibetan and Mahayana Buddhism do have
such methods. I used to hire Buddhist
monasteries for five years to visualize specific world leaders and practice the
Prajnaparamita ritual while meditating on them. Part of the Prajnaparamita
ritual is reading aloud the Heart Sutra.
A story. An evil magician in Tibet has the power to
kill others with his magic. And now he
has stated that he is going to kill a Tibetan priest. The Tibetan priest meditates
on Prajnaparamita, a lot like the letter U. In fact, the cosmic letter U on the akashic
plane would be virtually the same thing.
The priest meditates: there is no
separation. There is no enemy. There is no attack from an
the enemy. And there is no one here to
attack. There is no identity—only emptiness
and oneness without separation.
And now the evil magician unleashes the full
power of his magic against the priest.
It is the power to destroy, annihilate, and obliterate. But gee, this massive will and energy can’t
find anything to attack. It looks and
looks, but there is no priest anywhere to be found.
Like a torpedo launched from a submarine
with its own sonar, it goes looking for its target. But if it can not find its target the torpedo
returns to its source—the only thing around that is available to attack. The black magician falls
dead victim of the magic sent by his own will.
The Prajnaparamita
ritual/cosmic letter U akasha dissolves evil and malicious intentions. But individuals still have the freedom to
choose and to learn from the consequences of their actions. You can never take that away without causing
new karma. So in some cases, if
individuals desire to destroy they end up only destroying themselves.
If I
might be so bold, the repertoire of any genuine world class peacemaker
would certainly contain such a practice.
It would be one of many methods at his disposal and to be used at his
discretion. And when he used it, he
would not be acting as a human being but as a servant and agent of Divine
Providence. It is about acting, as the
beatitude states, as “the children of God.”
Mental
Plane
The
shiny, ivory black color on the
mental plane says “I am the source from which all the specific opposing forces
and polarities you are considering arise.
They take their birth from me; they are a part of me, and yet they do
not express all of me.”
Is capitalism opposed to communism? What is
the source from which they both arise?
Or, what do all systems of economics share in common? What basic problems must they resolve
regardless of the ideology?
Are you in conflict with another person?
What is the source from which you both arise?
Like
the akashic plane, the sound
dissolves into the color and sensation.
Here it heightens your vision in the process—it dissolves your illusions
and limited concepts allowing you to perceive more clearly from the whole
rather than from a specific perspective.
The
sensation also is like the akashic
in that it is undifferentiated but here it is more specific. Take the opposites and various components of
whatever you are considering and unite them as one energy
so they are no longer separate.
Fire and water? Try gasoline, a liquid but
with a high potential to ignite. Or how about alcohol or liquor? A liquid with
“spirits” in it. You can drink
it.
It depends on the situation confronting
you. Put them together, unite them, and
find their common source.
How
about will and love? Their
common source? Compassion. Or altruism, justice, idealism—it depends on
the situation you are considering.
What is in common source between a writer and
the big publishing houses? Their common source is a reader enjoying what has
been written. This is what unites and
draws the writer and the publishing houses together.
How
does the akashic plane differ from the mental plane with the letter U? I site
the example often as mentioned in Wikipedia: At the age of fifteen in 1950, the Dalai Lama
was enthroned as the head of Tibet. This
was one month after China invaded Tibet.
In 1954, the Dalai Lama met with Mao Zedong in Beijing. In 1959, the Dalai Lama fled Tibet.
However, in 1954 at the meeting with Mao
Zedong, Mao told the Dalai Lama that religion is the opiate of the people quoting
Marx. China had been treated terribly by
England. The East India Company during
the 1830’s, acting for and within the national interest of England, shipped
tons of opium to Canton, China. It
traded the opium for manufactured good and for tea. The trade wrecked havoc on China producing
vast numbers of opium addicts.
So when Mao said that religion is the opium
of the people he was saying that religion is a means to enslave and repress a
population. Religion is an economic
disaster that destroys industrial development due to its close alliance with
imperialism.
Tibetan Buddhism has a truly magnificent
understanding of akasha on the akashic plane.
But when it comes to how akasha asserts its harmony by balancing the
four elements on the mental plane, well, Tibetan Buddhism is a disaster waiting
to happen.
If the Dalai Lama had wise counselors, they
would have kept their minds attuned to mental plane questions like what is the
situation and what are our options and choices. And what resources are
available to us to solve these problems?
But the young Dalai Lama did not have access
to such wisdom. Entranced by akasha and
entangled in the routines of a feudal society, Tibet failed utterly to
establish embassies and alliances with other nations to guarantee its survival
as a nation. It had no cultural
exchange. Entranced by akasha, it failed
utterly to acquire even the most rudimentary understanding of how it was a
nation among other nations.
If
the Dalai Lama had wise counselors, he could have handed Mao a copy of John
Nash’s 1949 thesis which explained that there is no class warfare. There is instead a nonviolent point of
harmony between any two opposing parties.
Furthermore, for any economic system to succeed you must factor in
individual motivation in order to reach the highest level of productivity.
In other words, Chinese Communism will
somehow have to allow for the people to be represented in the government if it
is to succeed. The Dalai Lama could have
said simply, “The karma is that if China represses religion and individual
freedom it will inevitably change into its opposite—before you know what has
happened your communism will become capitalism regardless of what you call
it.”
The Dalai Lama could have applied akasha to
the mental plane by saying “Obviously you are about to invade Tibet. Nonetheless, here is the situation and here
are your
options and choices. If you continue to
blindly follow an aging ideology, you will end up killing thirty million of
your own people through your economic mistakes and seriously delay your
inevitable rise to power among the nations.”
[On the other hand, if the Dalai Lama’s
counselors were intelligent enough to have read and understood obscure papers
on economic theory and conflict resolution, Mao probably would have seen them
as a resource to be put to work rather than as an obstacle to be overcome. He would have placed them in charge of
running his economy.
Trust me on this—any dictator or other on a
quest for absolute power for good or for evil design will, without doubt,
always and forever be on the lookout for wise and trustworthy counselors he can
rely upon. They ease his burden and make
life more satisfying.]
The conflicts, the components of
conflicts, and the entire set of variable and options we confront as we think
about the future are derived from the akashic plane. Akasha is their source. You can bet that there will always be a path
of harmony somewhere to be found on the mental plane. You just have to attuned your mind to akasha
to understand the specific shape that path takes.
Franz
Bardon says “The ‘U’ oscillation evokes the highest form of intuition and inspiration in the mental body….”
I imagine that intuition here would indicate what the right thing to do
is from the point of view of akasha.
Again, it would indicate the path of harmony between the opposites and
conflicts we confront with our minds.
In the movie 300, the wife of the king of Sparta says to her husband, “Forget
about religion. Forget that you are
king. Just ask yourself as a man, “What
is the right thing to do?” To say what she said was actually a greater act of
courage than the king who was moved to action by her question. The right answer
to this question will lead you to akasha as it moves through the mental plane.
The poet Gary Snyder’s Zen master said to
him at the end of his studies, “The perfect path is always easy; strive hard! (to attain it).” The
path between opposites is always there.
The world is created from a oneness that knows
no separation. The obstacles and
opposition and conflicts can be incredible.
But a path is there to be found.
In Homer’s Odyssey, the Greek gods looked down with favor upon Odysseus. This was because he was clever. When there were problems no one else could
solve, he could find solutions. He did
not limit himself to one point of view or perspective. Over and over, he takes everyone’s point of
view into consideration and then he acts.
As
for inspiration, I imagine that it
is to move through life without feeling that anything is opposing me. As in, “I am not in opposition to
anything.” We have heard the command,
“Love your enemies.” From the
perspective of U, our enemies are not our enemies. They are a part of a greater mystery unfolding.
The Dalai Lama was asked, “How can you feel
compassion for the Chinese when they have murdered a million Tibetan
monks?” His reply was in effect to say
that “like all of us they are struggling to find their way through life, to
have their basic needs fulfilled. How
can I not feel compassion for them?”
The
cosmic letter U is rather insistent when it comes to the things that oppose
us. It says, “Use your intuition and
inspiration to figure out what you have in common with your opponents. Discover the awareness that underlies both of
your lives.”
Imagine two American Indian tribes in the
seventeenth century. It is true that
some tribes were known as peacemakers such as the Menominee in Wisconsin. But we are considering two warring tribes as
a simple substitute for warring nations.
Akasha says to them, “Do I not provide the same sunlight to fall on both
of you, the same rain, and the same moonlight?
Do I not provide the same fruit and crops and animals to hunt?
“Is the breath in one of you more valuable
to me than the breath in another of you? Is the blood in the veins of one of
you more valuable to me than that in the veins of another? When you meet your enemy, you should treat
that person as if his soul is part of your own.
“I have created both of you—I am the same
electricity beating in your hearts. If you know me you would also feel and
understand this.
“You
can go on striving against each other and carrying on your wars. You can go on doing this for a very long
time. But in the end if you wish to
survive you will learn to work together.
And if you wish to ascend—to create with my power—you must learn that
you are one with each other.”
Franz
Bardon also says that that the U oscillation “renders it possible for the Quabbalist to explore and master his own karma and its
modification.” In other words, you can
step out of the role you are playing on the stage of life. You can leave the stage stepping out of your
assigned role and go out and sit in the darkness of the theater among the
audience. From there you can observe the
drama of your life being played out.
You do not have to play the role assigned
to you. You do not even have to act in a particular play. There will always be drama and choices to be
made. But amid the drama and choices you
can shine like the sun and the moon or you can be a candle that has burnt
out. By your choice you determine your
fate. And your choice is shaped by the
light within your heart.
And
so we return to Shakespeare’s drama of a prince. Hamlet confronts one of the most difficult
decisions found in world literature. Hamlet
is commissioned by a ghost to establish justice in a kingdom when there is no
real evidence of a crime having even been committed—just the emotional
utterances of a ghost, now a lost soul or worse, maybe a demon in disguise,
claiming to be his father and that he was murdered by Hamlet’s uncle and mother
who are now the king and queen.
Review the mental plane
questions:
What is the situation? What is the
bottom line when it comes to options and decisions? What resources are available for arriving at
the right solution? And as always, What is the right
thing to do?
At
first it appears Hamlet rises to the occasion.
He must conduct an investigation without anyone knowing he is doing so,
otherwise if the ghost is right and any suspicion arises as to Hamlet
intentions, Hamlet will be dead in the night.
And so Hamlet trusts no one. He
pretends that he has mental problems.
His investigation
is brilliant. One of
the resources available to him? A troupe of players
are to perform a play in the court.
Hamlet rewrites the play (you have some privileges if you are a prince)
performed for the royal court that gets the king to betray himself by revealing
his remorse. And later Hamlet obtains on
the sly an actual confession from the king as the king prays to God of the
great wrong he has committed. There it
is: proof way beyond all reasonable doubt.
At that very moment, Hamlet has the power
to strike. By his own hand, justice he
can met out—kill the king and no more haunting by the
ghost and justice is done after a fashion.
After all, Hamlet is prince. The
kingdom by all that is right now belongs to him. A king establishes justice in accordance to
the options available to him—winners get to write the history books and in doing
so set up the lighting for the foreground and the background—so readers have a
“clear” perspective in viewing a chain of events.
Hamlet hesitates. Because the king has confessed, he will not
go to hell if he is killed this night.
And Hamlet feels that such a crime this man has committed in killing a
king out of greed and lust for the king’s wife does not merit heaven as a
reward. Better that justice is done
after the king has sinned.
But this is all pure, unmitigated
rationalization. Hamlet’s hesitation in
no way moves toward answering the question, What is
the right thing to do?
Options? Back to our resource—actors are also capable of
improvisation. After all, Shakespeare
wrote this play so that people like me a long way away could sort out Hamlet’s
options. These questions face anyone and
not just an imaginary prince—the Dalai Lama, Gandhi, Mao, Hitler, Nixon,
Mandela, Yeltsin, Putin, Napoleon, George Washington,
Bhutto, etc. What are my options as in what
is the best way to revolve conflicts amid opposing forces?
Hamlet could have sequestered the actor’s
troupe in a barn somewhere. Offered gold now and a theater later when Hamlet is king. Grant them royal patronage. And mention that if they betrayed his secret
he would know because they would be dead before Hamlet—to kill a prince you
must use caution; killing actors can be done by whispering one sentence to a
few hencemen.
And so Hamlet his actors
in a barn. He explains to them
the inciting incident about the ghost appearing to a prince and so forth. And
now Hamlet commands, “I want to see some spontaneity and truth as you act out
five scenarios about what this prince can do.”
Our actors rise to the occasion. I mean, who has ever asked them to really
act, to perform art, so as to decide the fate of a kingdom. They throw themselves into their parts.
In the first scenario, the actor playing
Hamlet pretends that nothing is wrong.
If the prince acts like nothing is wrong, then
there is no problem. The prince publicly proclaims his loyalty to the new
king.
And one night when having a night cap with
the king in private, the prince says he feels awkward saying this, but his
mother looks so much happier married to the new king. She is so radiant. Her previous husband was a real drag and
Hamlet never did like him. And then the
prince stumbles off as if, since he is drunk, he has already forgotten what he
said.
The actor/prince then says in an aside to
the audience, “The king and queen actually trust me. They come to rely on me. And now I wait for the king and queen to slip
up. It may be soon or it may take years,
but I will have my revenge and it shall be sweet.”
Hamlet says, “And now for your second
scenario.”
The
actor playing Hamlet pretends his has mental problems and disguises his
investigation in search of solid evidence of the king’s wrong doing. But as the actors play out this arc of the
plot, Hamlet gets killed. It is all just
too obvious. The king and queen are
suspicious right from the start.
Hamlet says, “I have seen enough. And to think that I thought I could get away
with doing precisely that.”
I
think you get the idea. Consider your
options. Discover and use your
resources. Learn to ask the right
questions of the right people at the right time. Is Hamlet done? Not by a long shot:
Hamlet:
“I understand the wisdom of the first scenario.
I call it survival. But I find it
very distasteful. Can you explain how
you as an actor could possibly remain silent knowing that such injustice has been done and appearing to do nothing about it?”
Actor
playing Hamlet: “That is quite simple, my lord.” And taking another actor and whispering in
his ear, the actor sits upon the throne and says, “In this brief scene, the
prince has now been king for ten and five years. And, having married his sweetheart, who has
not committed suicide, they have a son.
And the son asks his father, “Tell me father, how could
you have managed to remain silent all those years knowing that the king
had actually murdered your father the true king?”
“My reply?” says the actor speaking
rhetorically. “I tell my son this: I did
what was right--I waited for the right moment to strike. Rather than risk a civil war with so many
innocent killed to make a point, I found a way to establish justice without
having to build on a foundation of destruction.”
And
Hamlet walks up to the actor, puts his hands on his shoulder and says, “I see
your point. I just do not know if
silence such as you portray does so deep through my soul flow. If patience be a virtue, will my soul not rot
under its tutelage? Will I awake in the dead of night with a ghostly fright and
think to myself, ‘I would rather be dead than to live one more day having to
pretend that the king and queen are righteous knowing
in truth that they are malicious.’”
I
would like to introduce into the play Krishna and the Bhagavad-Gita.
Remember Krishna, he is the one said, “I am
never without action.” Krishna spoke to Arjuna amid
two great armies about to engage in war.
And Arjuna’s heart failed him for he look
across the field and saw his life long friends and teachers among the
enemy.
But Krishna spoke to Arjuna
saying, “I have become your friend that light might be preserved on
earth.” And then Krishna guided Arjuna through the deepest fibers of his being. He said,
I am the infinite, eternal,
and the immortal Self--no fire can burn, no water dissolve, no air dry, and no
sword pierce…. Before such gory space melts away into nothingness, time
vanishes into non-existence, and causation dwindles into emptiness. Ranging beyond names and forms, passing free
into woods and forests, mountains and rivers, into day and night, clouds and
stars, passing free into men and women, animals and angels, as the Self of each
and all am I. Truth flows from me just as light radiates from the sun and
fragrance emanates from a flower...I am the transcendental bliss, the absolute
intelligence, the supreme synthesis of consciousness that shines in the shrine
of every heart.
Krishna
is a nice stand in for akasha. You can
write characters and dialogue like that into the Mahabarata. But this is impossible for Shakespeare in
Elizabethan England. Instead, we might
imagine our little troupe of actors suddenly having an inspiration.
An actor says in an aside, “I take you to
King David’s bed as he dies and speaks now his last words. And these are his very words spoken not to
his son Solomon but rather to our prince when he awakes at night in a fright. Let the prince recall this scene we are about
to play out:
King David: “The
spirit of God spoke to me these words—He that rules over men must be just,
ruling in the fear of God. And he shall
be as the light of the morning, when the sun rises, even a morning without
clouds; as the tender grass springing out of the earth by clear shining after
rain.”
“Think
about it,” the actor goes on, “if he shall be as the light of the morning,
there must first be a night. I mean you
have to listen carefully and analyze the verb’s tense. I know that you already like comparisons
involving predicates--“to be” and “not to be.” But consider carefully he “shall
be” but he is “not yet.”
“Hamlet, it is the way of nature—if you want
to be the dawning light, you will have to find your way through the night. You recall that saying, ‘You have to die if
you want to bring forth new life. Power, if it is to be just, requires
sacrifice. Hamlet, with all due respect,
distaste is a small price to pay.
Patience and waiting performed in silence are more deadly than any sword.”
What does the cosmic letter U say about all
of this on the mental plane? What
underlies Hamlet and the king and his mother the queen? What is their common source in regard to this
conflict?
I have said it before,
Power
exists in order to be of service to others.
If you use power with love, wisdom, and divine purpose, then its
accomplishments endure through all ages of the world. Or, put simply: discover your resources. And find the path of harmony between opposing
forces. Otherwise, fate (that is karma
under the laws of akasha) rolls the dice to determine the time and place where you
face the consequences of your actions.
Astral
Plane
The
color takes us to the source of any
feeling or astral situation, vibration or polarity.
The
sensation is being malleable. It has an extreme flexibility. It is capable of being anything similar to
the way touch can express any emotion—you can grab to save or to enslave; you
can touch as lust or as purest love. The
sensation says in effect “I will be anything you wish.” It is rich. It is thick, and can take on the life within
anything.
The
sound dissolves any astral polarity
revealing the source that underlies it.
Bardon
mentions that practicing letter U on the astral plane enables you to transfer
you consciousness anywhere and so learn to master it. And it enables you to evoke any state of
trance.
Put simply, you learn to assume any astral
vibration within your consciousness. You
can experience opposites: you can be A or B that opposes A or you can be both A
and B at the same time in a state of unity or the source from which they arise—this
is speaking in terms of feeling, motivation, and emotional force.
Robert
McKee, perhaps the foremost teacher of how to write screenplays, is skeptical
about romantic movies. Studios want to
pay him a million dollars to write a modern romance but he says he can’t do
it. For a modern romantic movie, you
have to have a great obstacle that keeps lovers apart and so the movie is about
them overcoming the obstacle.
Then
McKee tells you about the real problem: he says, “Feminism is a good thing. But it
has killed romance.” I think what he
means is that if you have the same capability in women as in men that feminism
proclaims, then there is no longer enough polarity between
the two genders to produce genuine romance.
You can always pretend and act like there is romance. There is still a lot of fun to be had. But this is no more than playing a part in a
romantic comedy. Genuine romantic
feelings are nowhere to be found.
His point—the knight in shining armor, the
navy seal coming out of the water, the captain of the nuclear submarine, and
the space shuttle commander could just as easily be a woman as a man. It was not that way in the old days and so
what went before is now gone.
Bruce Willis might star in another Die Hard movie but as a matter of fact
Catherine Zeta-Jones is probably in far better physical shape than Bruce Willis
ever was. I asked two people about this
and they both replied, “Die Hard is a
man’s role.” But in fact a woman could
play the role these days just as easily as a man.
Be that as it may, from the cosmic letter
U’s point of view, romance is still alive and well. It is very simple: it is two people sharing with tenderness their two bodies in common or,
put another way, it one consciousness sharing two bodies—you share every
perception, thought, sensual and emotional experience.
You may have very different histories,
ways of thinking, feeling, and perceiving.
You may have very different ways of growing and goals you are hoping to
fulfill. But you share so the other’s
goals are also your own and the other’s needs are yours equally.
If you have the letter U developed on the
astral plane, it is extremely easy to get inside of another person and share
that person’s deepest experiences. Even
the other’s nervous system is open for you to experience. I give a simple example of how to do this
under Four Planes at the end of this
essay—see One Minute Seminar.
A story. Imagine a city in ancient
Greece. The king has magical
powers. He sits on his thrown but he is
master of cosmic letter U on the astral plane.
Without need of advice or counselor, he can quite easily see through the
eyes or hear the words spoken by anyone anywhere in his kingdom. And he does this without security cameras on
every corner or a video camera mounted on the hood of police cars.
Actually, the CIA with its remote viewing
program attempted to accomplish something like this. They wanted to view the enemies’ military
installations, locate their submarines, and find kidnapped individuals. Pretty strange, huh?
As a spiritual anthropologist, over the
years I have come across one or two individuals who are gifted in this
way. When she dreams, one woman I know
can see and hear what others are doing and saying in remote locations. She even perceives events about to happen to
them. She does not have the mental plane
awareness of how to work out karma or find solutions, but she does quite nicely
on the astral.
I
read an individual’s palm once and told him, “In this life time, you will only
experience deep love from one woman. But
what have you done that she is so incredibly angry at you? I can feel her wrath right now as she sends
it to destroy your aura.”
We talked and I have him a meditation to do
in which he pictured the two of them lovingly caring for their child. The next day she called him and wanted to get
together again. This was an astral
meditation. You make a direct and inner
emotional connection to another as if there is no separation between the two of
you. You feel one with each other.
The problem that I did not work on with him
was that he did not have a sense of inner contentment. As one of the foremost investors in the
world, Warren Buffet, points out you have to be content in yourself in order to
do well with success. Otherwise, you
reach too soon for you goal or overreach and fall when you are on top.
The
individual in this example was gifted at succeeding, but he used other people’s
energy to get where he was. And most
people will only put up with that for so long.
I should have had him do the mental plane
exercise of imagining that you are in the audience watching your own
performance on the stage. And then you
ask, “What would be different about that character if he were successful in
life?”
If he had been perceptive, he would have
said, “Is that really me? Do I really exploit people in that way? What can I do
about it?”
Answer? “Simple, always give back as much as
you take. Now get up on the stage and
let me see you act in a few scenes where you first give back before walking
away.”
As
for Hamlet, Hamlet too would have needed to role play a few scenes in order to
explore his emotional reactions. It is
not enough to think. You have to feel
the part as well.
I once had a class enact a role playing
session in which the goal was to get the keys away from a friend at a party so
he does not drive home drunk behind the wheel.
We broke into three groups and had three presentations. The first group ended up wrestling the guy to
the floor to get his keys from him. They
were very emotionally involved with their parts even though it was role
playing.
The second group simply had someone go out
to the car and pull a wire so it wouldn’t start. But the third group won the competition. They had a girl go up to the guy at the party
who was drunk and talk sweet to him. He
ended up giving her his keys and agreeing to have someone else drive him
home.
When you are dealing with emotions, it is
not necessarily about reason or options.
It is about the right emotional interaction that takes you to where you
want to go. Astral energies are what
make you feel alive. When they are bad,
everything else, like an electrical system, can short out. When they are good, you feel like you are
right where you are supposed to be.
My
mother had something of this U awareness on an astral level when it comes to
conflict resolution—as in identifying with the underlying common ground of the
relationship. She had a sorority sister in
college who picked on her and gave her a hard time. My mother could have reacted by being
passive, a victim. She could have
reacted by getting even, by attacking.
Instead, she started doing little things
for the other person. Helping her out in
any she could. In effect, my mother became
the other person’s best friend. Presto,
no more conflict. You could say that my
mother was being submissive to this person.
But that is not the case. My
mother knew exactly what she was doing.
She acted in a way so as to destroy the other person’s opposition. I have seen her do this many times.
Physical
Plane
The
color is the state of awareness that
underlies physical matter whether animate and inanimate.
The
sensation is an
awareness like delta brain waves.
It is intensely awake and aware when normally deep sleep doe not allow
for perceptional activity. This energy
or power underlies any set of polarities or components making up physical
matter.
The
sound dissolves opposites taking you
into the state of underlying unity.
In
other words, U is an awareness that senses the dense vibrations of the physical
world. It puts itself easily within
these vibrations. Bardon says the U on
this level reveals the mysteries of akasha as it influences physical
matter. And it reveals all aspects of
the four pole magnet.
Bardon is referring to the electric and
magnetic fluid in its active and passive aspects and the way this force is the
matrix from which all matter arises. A
very simple illustration of the four pole magnet is seen in male and female
attraction. The man has electric energy
around his genitals and magnetic around his head and the woman is the reverse
with the magnetic around her genitals and electric around her head.
As sometimes occurs, a man wants sex to
express love. Don’t tell me you have
never seen this. Whatever sex is for the
woman, it is not the same as for the man.
She gets pregnant. She delivers
and nurses a baby. She may or may not
appreciate any of this but she does in fact have a chance to experience a level
of bonding before and after delivery that a man will never know. Still, she may then feel stuck in the home wanting
to get out and have a life, a career. He still wants sex and the role sex plays
for a man most women will never understand.
Typically, in the old days, he had a
career. He is out and about and active
in the world. His electric
sexual/instinctual energy makes him active.
Her magnetic/instinctual energy gives her easier access to nurturing and
bonding.
For him, he has to develop the magnetic
energy around his head if he is to grow.
Sex grants him straightforward, direct, and easy access to magnetic
energy which is embodied in this case in the lower part of a woman’s body. There is a learning curve but it is indirect
and round about. He becomes a father and
provides for a home. He learns to
nurture and care but only in an indirect way. In no way or very rarely will he learn
contentment and inner peace from experiencing a woman’s sexuality.
Similarly, a career represents for a woman a
straightforward, direct, and easy access to electrical energy which is so
prevalent in our society. A career
grants her a chance to make decisions in concert with others, to be productive
out of the house and in society, and to learn how to take charge of
herself. There is a learning curve but
it too is indirect and around about. In
no way or very rarely will she learn self-mastery and putting all her being on
the line to accomplish a mission through work or through a career.
If the man masters the magnetism around
his head, he becomes nurturing, caring, empathic, and loving. And he attains inner peace. If the woman masters the electric energy
around her head, she becomes dynamic, a leader, and fearless. Her independence and autonomy are then not
derived from something else but part of her own being.
The letter U is the awareness of the
electric and magnetic in both active and passive aspects all together and
throughout the entire process of development.
If the man masters the U awareness, he realizes sex is a sacrament. Easy to say the words in a
marriage ceremony. But to perform
a transformation is required. You have
to attain to an inner union with the woman.
Similarly, if a woman masters the U
awareness, she realizes that a career is a sacrament. It is a form of service to the world. One sacrament is inner. The other is outer. If you have
watched this kind of U awareness in action, you may come to agree that the inner
is as powerful as the outer in shaping the unfolding of the world.
To summarize this simple illustration for
what it is worth:
The
male:
Fire/electric sexuality: makes him
aggressive. He is forced to learn to
take charge of himself and to act.
Through contact with the world, he becomes dynamic, decisive, and
strong.
Water/magnetic head: poorly developed
emotions, insensitive, sentimental.
When developed,
he becomes caring and empathic. He
learns to understand with clarity and impartiality.
The
female:
Water/magnetic sexuality: makes her
receptive. She is forced to learn to
bond and nurture. Through contact with
children and family, she becomes sensitive, connected, and maternal.
Fire/electric head: dependent, poorly
developed decision making abilities, opinionated and/or prone to adopting
other’s ideas, beliefs, or ideologies without thinking.
When
developed, she can accomplish what men rarely comprehend—how to be organized,
in charge, decisive, and yet completely empathic and sensitive at the same
time.
This
is the four pole magnetic on the physical plane in
terms of social relationships. It is a
simple illustration. You can make up your own illustration in terms of your
experience and background. The point is that the U awareness easily comprehends
both male and female experiences in all aspects during the entire process of
development. It is not limited to just Homo
sapiens. It encompasses anything that
takes physical form.
Four
Planes
In summary,
On
the akashic plane, the U is a
consciousness that exists before anything manifests in separate forms. It reveals the original purposes behind
anything.
On the mental
plane, it is the source that underlies all the components and forces giving
birth to any situation in which you will make a decision. It enables you to change karma and grants the
highest intuition and inspiration.
On the astral plane, it is the ability to assume any astral vibration or
feeling without limitation.
On the physical
level, it is the awareness/energy underlying anything that manifests in the
physical world.
A
One Minute Seminar
In
the following brief, humorous scene, the U manifests through the skill of
active listening, projecting your mind into another person, getting a body
sensation, and then mentioning what you feel.
This leads to a deep level of connection underlying two people.
Here
we are folks at a world famous Yacht Club.
I have standing next me to my right the most eligible bachelor in the
state. Let’s call him Brad. Next
to him is his current stock broker (James—all these names are
fictitious). And to my left is an actual group of self-proclaimed
cheerleaders both rooting for Brad and carrying on a discussion of Bard’s
current girlfriend.
Me: “Excuse me ladies. Can you tell me why you consider yourselves a
group of cheerleaders for Brad?”
Susan: “I think we feel we are out of the running or never qualified for the
running. But we still feel we have a vested interest in the outcome.”
Me: “Ah yes. I think I kind of understand. But
why this bachelor? What makes him so special?”
Linda: “He’s handsome, successful, wealthy, a great sailor, has a
beautiful sailboat, great to crew for, and has hundreds of friends. It makes a
woman feel good just to be around him.”
Me: “Really? So what’s the cheerleader squad discussing tonight?”
Jennifer: “We’re questioning Brad’s attitude toward women. He says he is
not really serious when he dates but come on. I think he is naïve about
women if he thinks those he is dating aren’t really serious about him.”
Susan: “Look. I run my own bar and I have seen a lot of dating going on.
And unless a guy is intimate with a woman he owes her exactly nothing.”
Me: “So you are saying on the one hand that Brad is misleading women and yet
technically it’s the women who are misleading themselves. Is that a fair
summary?”
Jennifer: “Yah. Judging from his track record, he usually takes about
seven years to decide to marry a woman ….because he doesn’t want to go through
the trauma of breaking up. Not being serious is his way of being
cautious. I mean, look at the way he hangs out with a woman--his arm
around the girl he is dating and how he kisses her. When I see that there
is no way the woman isn’t going to get involved.”
Me: “So has this been a problem with his latest date?”
Susan: “He’s a man. He thinks of a woman in terms of whether 1. She has
‘excess baggage,’ 2. She is ‘damaged goods,’ and 3. Whether
or not she is ‘high maintenance.’”
Me: “So he is kind of picky.”
Linda: “His real problem is not the women he will finally marry. The
problem is that after two years the woman will finally catch on to what Brad is
really about.”
Me: “And what is that?”
Linda: “For Brad, the first thing in his life is business. The second is
his social life. The third thing is his sailing and hanging out down here
at the Yacht Club. At best, his wife
will only be fourth on his list of priorities.”
Me: “That could be a problem, huh? But why should we speculate? Let’s ask
Brad for an opinion.”
Me: “Say Brad. I have been talking to your cheerleaders here and they are
questioning your interpersonal skills. They suspect they may not be sufficient
to keep a woman happy once you marry here.”
Brad: “Its true. In my past marriages, my wives
left me. Got any ideas?”
Me: “Ladies? No thoughts? We’ll, have you heard about the three day
seminar on relationships taught in one minute?”
Brad: “Well, I have a minute. Let’s do it.”
Me: “There are three components. First, once a week sit down and listen
to a woman for fifteen minutes. During this time, utilize only active
listening. That is, on occasion paraphrase what she is saying and also
suggest what you sense she is feeling as she talks. For example, Susan
here says flat out that a woman has no claim on you unless you are intimate
with her. And I suspect she feels that the only important thing you
should be concerned about in dating is finding the right woman. Susan is
concerned about what is best for you. This is active listening: capture both
thoughts and feelings.”
Susan: “You got that right.”
Me: “The second component is that after fifteen minutes you place your mind
inside of the other person. Just to make it challenging, I will pick
James here since I know nothing about him and have never heard him say
anything. To do this, just image you are the other person—you have the
other person’s body, feelings, mind, gestures, body posture, vocal intonations,
word choices, etc. Get right inside the other so you are one.
“Ok, here I am imagining I am inside of James. And this
brings us to the third component—wait inside the other until you get a
distinct body sensation. This sensation is a gut level connection to the
other person.
“With James the sensation I now have is that he is a very relaxed person, ready
to let go and let his life completely unfold in any way it wants. But if
you look at James sitting here on that bar stool, his posture and facial
expression suggest he is tense, uptight, and worrying about something.
How am I doing, James?”
James: “You are absolutely right. People keep thinking I am an uptight
kind of guy. But I have all the clients I need and I am actually cutting
back in my business. I am looking forward to retiring and I completely
happy with my life.”
Me: “Do you feel we know each James?”
James: “You seem to know me better than my best friends.”
Linda: “What if Brad doesn’t do this once a week once he marries a
woman?”
Me: “Then his wife can actually do it on Brad. Intimacy that is magical
like this can be established unilaterally. And as a matter of fact lovers
in this life rarely worry about how their inner connection came to be.
They just know when it is there and when it is not. If they have it, all
the other difficulties and worries that accompany the relationship remain
secondary.”
In
summary, the U awareness allows you freedom of movement so your consciousness
can move back and forth between yourself and another. In so doing, you discover the one energy and
connection that underlies and joins both of you.
The
Ghost of Christmas Future/the Magic Mirror of Peacemakers
On
the akashic level, I told the story of a Tibetan priest who overcome the malice
of a black magician. I mentioned any
genuine world class peacemaker should have such a method in his repertoire. Let us explore this concept further.
In the Old Testament, a prophet actually
acted out what I call the Magic Mirror of Peacemakers. He told King David about a man who stole from
his neighbor and killed the neighbor in the process. King David was outraged and immediately
wanted to know who this man was so that justice might be done. The prophet said, “You are this man”
referring to how King David had the husband of Bathsheba killed so he could
marry her.
Consider A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. Ebenezer Scrooge is taken on a tour through
time by the ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future. The three ghosts show him the love he lost,
the needs and love of those in the present, and his future. The ghost of Christmas future shows him his
final end, where he will be when he dies and how no one any longer cares about
him.
The ghost of Christmas future is
silent. He does not speak. But he has the power to reveal the fate of a
person. This is again our magic mirror
of the cosmic letter U.
I am planning to develop a
scene in my screenplay from a little piece of dialogue: “Imagine that you have power over anyone on earth. Imagine further that you can not interfere
with an individual’s freedom of choice.
And you can also not interfere if an individual decides he wishes to
learn from the consequences of his own actions.”
This is the cosmic letter U on the mental
plane. It easily can determine another’s
fate and how he or she has strayed from his or her original purpose. It can not interfere with freedom of choice
because each person has akasha inside. Each
person can determine his own fate.
But if an individual’s choices create great
harm to others, then more than this one individual is involved. In this case, the extent of the harm can be
altered. It can be reduced.
Individuals collectively learn from bad
examples. But if the injury is too
great, the collective learning curve falls dramatically. An asteroid can crash down and hit the earth
killing millions. Or it can illuminate
the entire sky as it burns up glancing off the atmosphere from at angle. In this case, in which the world economy is
not thrown into recession from the devastation, human beings might get the idea
that perhaps a little prevention is in order.
When suffering is too great, people are
numb. They go into survival mode. Figuring out what happened is left to future
generations who may not appreciate the lesson because they did not witness the
events.
With the letter U, you can not only show people
their fate as did the ghost of Christmas future. You can determine when that fate will happen.
You can suspend time, bringing closer to the present the karmic
consequence that would otherwise take years or decades before it arrives. You do not change what is to occur to an
individual. You just change the time
frame.
In this case, an individual still has his
freedom of choice. But if he wishes is
to destroy, as much as is possible, you are free to allow his destruction to be
limited to himself and not to many others he would take down with him.
This is the Prajnaparamita
ritual: you let the malice return to the one who sends it.
This is Krishna: Krishna in the Mahabarata. He talked to everyone involved. He saw all sides. He did everything that could be done to
prevent the war. In a sense, just by
being present with his transcendental awareness, Krishna determined the
outcome.
This also Psalm 90: “You turn men to destruction and say, ‘Return you children
of men.’” Karma is the law that brings
about destruction as individuals allow the negative side of the four elements
to work within them. But there is an
akashic voice that says, “Return”—your dwelling place is with the divine. If the silent ghost of Christmas future were
to speak, he would say one word, “Return,” that is, return to your original
purposes and not the ones that result from your twisted ways.
Cigila is one of
the spirits of the earthzone who specializes in offering divine missions
according to your own interests.
http://williammistele.com/cigila.html
What
Cigila attempts to do is simply to reduce suffering
on earth. His nature is compassion.
What I am suggesting is that a few
individuals, when you are ready, assume oversight for human evolution. We are due for a great deal of suffering in
the future no doubt. But much of this
suffering can be prevented or reduced, especially that part that derives from
abuses of power.
“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called the children of God.” To be a peacemaker, you have to find
akasha in yourself. This is not a casual
study. It is not an act of devotion or
religion. They do not teach this in seminaries.
No evangelist or preacher has a clue as to its existence. No monk in any monastery places it at the
forefront of his consciousness. All the
same, it takes a lot of work and commitment.
As with all these cosmic letters, the idea
is to practice them until they are a part of you. Then using them is a natural action like a
river flowing to the sea.
The
Voice of the Cosmic Letter U
Below
is my own version of Prajnaparamita, the
Bhagavad-Gita, the 90th Psalm, and Lao Tzu. It is
The voice of
the cosmic letter U:
There is no vice I can not twist or bend
And make again into its opposite
virtue
There is no compulsion or
obsession I can not
So fill with light it becomes
kind and bright
There is no ill will or malice I
can not
Convert into chivalry or true
nobility
There is no crunch or karmic
bind, no evil intent or design
I can not refine within my mind
Into contentment and absolute
satisfaction
There is no suffering
I can not so enfold within my
palms
Spit on, blow upon
And recreate as beauty hidden in
the heart of life
Such is my power and might
Such are the depths and the
heights
Where my wings fly
But there is a difference you see
Between you and me
When you breathe in
You nourish your body
And expel your doubts
But in one breath
I consume entire lifetimes:
Grasping the horns of sorrow
I flex my will
Gather my strength
And sing songs of joy.